Method and system for storage-based intrusion detection and recovery

ABSTRACT

An intrusion detection and recovery system includes a copying module that creates a point-in-time copy of a storage level logical unit, the point-in-time copy including a volume copy of the storage level logical unit and a signature of the storage level logical unit, a comparison module that compares at least a portion of the point-in-time copy with a previous copy of the storage level logical unit, a judging module that, based on results of the comparison module, judges if a modification has occurred. A signature of the point-in-time copy is compared with a signature of the previous copy to detect a sign of an intrusion.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present application is a Continuation Application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/846,597, filed on Dec. 19, 2017, which is aContinuation Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/098,256,filed on Apr. 4, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,928,384, issued on Mar. 27,2018, which is a Continuation Application of U.S. patent application No.10/980,292, filed on Nov. 4, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,506,379, issuedon Mar. 17, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated hereinby reference.

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a method (and system) for protecting acomputer system against the manipulation of data stored in a datastorage arrangement of the microcomputer system. In particular, thepresent invention describes a method (and system) for monitoringaccesses to a data storage system and detecting an intrusion or anyother intentional or unintentional unwanted modification to persistentdata stored in the storage system. Furthermore, the present inventionrelates to a method (and system) for recovering data if an unwantedmodification is detected.

Description of the Related Art

Typically, intrusion detection methods and systems are used to protectdata stored in a computer from unwanted modifications, which compromisethe computer system. Unwanted modifications include, for example,intentional or unintentional modifications to the stored data, as wellas intrusions.

Conventional systems and methods have been developed for detecting whensomeone has compromised a computer system. Conventional intrusiondetection methods (and systems include network-based intrusion detectionand host based intrusion detection. Network-based methods detectintrusions in the networking systems, and include programs that searchfor suspicious activity in a network by monitoring the traffic on anetwork. Host-based methods, on the other hand, include software thatmonitor the activity of a host system and detect an intrusion on aparticular machine (e.g., local memories, hard discs, etc.). While theseapproaches can be effective, they can be easily compromised in manyways. Once the host system is compromised, intrusions may go unnoticedand permanent damage can be done to the system and the data it contains.

One of the components of a computer system which is less likely to becompromised is the storage system. Since these systems are exposed tothe outside world through a narrow applications programming interface(API) and their architecture is not as well known to the general publicas that of host systems, storage systems provide a good place to provideprotection against intrusion. Storage systems detect changes topersistent data and therefore can detect several types of intrusions,especially those which persist across boots.

Storage systems are particularly suited for detecting intrusions becausethey interface to the “outside world” in a limited way, for examplethrough the small computer systems interface (SCSI) command set which isa standard defined for connecting peripheral devices such as CD-ROMdrives to computers and are not as easily compromised themselves.

Intrusion detection techniques can be deployed in various storagesystems. For example, intrusions can be detected at block storage leveland in storage area network (SAN) devices, such as the SAN volumecontroller (SVC) and Enterprise Storage System (ESS).

There are several important advantages to using storage-based intrusiondetection systems. As mentioned above, storage devices are not readilyaccessible. It is easy to break into a CPU through a network. Forexample, in an Enterprise Storage System using a SAN, multiple clientmachines/servers are connected to a single storage system. Theservers/machines can be easily compromised, but the storage devices arenot easily accessed by intruders.

During an intrusion, something (e.g., a file) in the computer systemwill be modified. In particular, an intrusion will negatively affect thecomputer system. Many significant intrusions will cause a change insideof the storage device. The storage device is a good place to look forintrusions because most intrusions to the servers/machines will have animpact on the storage device, but the storage device itself is noteasily accessible to an intrusion.

Conventional systems have been developed for intrusion detection in fileservers or for memory, but there has been no solution for block storagesystems.

One conventional system for content protection in non-volatile storagedevices, creates signatures of regions of a storage system and then,once in a while (e.g., at reboot time), recreates the signatures. Ifanything has changed in the recreated signatures, then the systemconcludes that an unauthorized access has occurred.

In this system, however, if it is desired to recover the content priorto the intrusion, then one needs to have saved a copy of the regions ofinterest. This requires the user to make copies of the entire volume ofthe storage device. Copying the entire volume cannot be done frequentlybecause it takes a considerable amount of time. If, however, the copiesare not made regularly the content that the user can recover once anunauthorized access is discovered is very old and out of date.

This conventional system has been proposed for protecting the content ofnon-volatile memory (NVRAM) which is much smaller than a typical storagesystem. This system is not usable, however, for protecting a largerstorage system.

An additional shortcoming of this device is that if one createssignatures for a large storage system, calculating the signature will betoo costly and time consuming. To address this, the conventional systemproposes that the storage system is divided into regions and signaturesare created for only those regions of interest. This method cannot workfor storage devices where file systems are stored and a location of afile that a user is interested in changes or, for example, an increasein the size of a file is acceptable. Therefore, this conventional systemis essentially usable for protecting NVRAM and complementary metal oxidesemiconductor (CMOS) memories, and not secondary storage systems withdisks.

Prior to the present invention, there have been no storage-basedintrusion detection methods or systems not implemented in file serversthat monitor modifications to files and not only to memory regions. Thisprovides a great benefit as data blocks of a file can be scatteredaround and also can change location in time because of computer systemoperations, such as disk defragmentation. Systems where access rules aredefined for memory regions will be ineffective in such environments.

Furthermore, in conventional devices, in order to recover compromiseddata after an intrusion or any other possible source of unwanted change,it is necessary to have made a complete volume copy of data regions thatthe user desires to recover. While this may he practical in a smallstorage system such as the computer CMOS NVRAM, it would require asignificant amount of additional storage for storage systems.Additionally, since the volume copy is not generated periodically in theconventional systems, even when a volume copy exists, it can be veryoutdated.

Thus, prior to the present invention, there has been no intrusiondetection method (and system) where periodic point-in-time copies aremade so that the user will always have a recent copy to fall back towhen an intrusion is detected. Further, there has been no intrusiondetection method and system that performs periodic copies in a largestorage system.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the foregoing and other exemplary problems, drawbacks, anddisadvantages of the conventional methods and structures, an exemplaryfeature of the present invention is to provide a method and system fordetecting intrusions in stored data by creating time and space efficientpoint-in-time copies of a logical unit (LUN).

In a first aspect of the present invention, a method (and system) fordetecting intrusions to stored data, includes creating apoint-in-time-copy of a logical unit, and comparing at least a portionof the point-in-time-copy with a previous copy of the logical unit. Thepoint-in-time copy may include a volume copy of the logical unit or asignature of the logical unit. Additionally, the point-in-time copy mayinclude one or more signatures of one or more portions of the logicalunit. A signature is a function of a file which is usually much smallerthan the file. One can create the signature of the file, or the portionof the file, and then from the new copy create a new signature and thencompare these two signatures.

In a second aspect of the present invention, an intrusion detectionsystem, includes a storage system, the storage system including a unitthat detects an intrusion at a file system level, independent of a hostsystem.

In a third aspect of the present invention, a computer system fordetecting intrusions to stored data, includes means for creating apoint-in-time copy of a logical unit, and means for comparing at least aportion of the point-in-time copy with a previous copy of the logicalunit.

In a fourth aspect of the present invention, a signal-bearing mediumtangibly embodying a program of machine readable instructions executableby a digital processing apparatus to perform a method for detectingintrusions to stored data including creating a point-in-time copy of alogical unit, and comparing at least a portion of the point-in-time copywith a previous copy of the logical unit.

In a fifth aspect of the present invention, a method for deployingcomputing infrastructure, includes integrating computer-readable codeinto a computing system, wherein the compute readable code incombination with the computing system is capable of performing a methodfor detecting intrusions to stored data, wherein the method fordetecting intrusions to stored data includes creating a point-in-timecopy of a logical unit, and comparing at least a portion of thepoint-in-time copy with a previous copy of the logical unit.

In a sixth aspect of the present invention, an intrusion detection andrecovery system includes a copying module that creates a point-in-timecopy of a logical unit, and a. comparison module that compares at leasta portion of the point-in-time copy with a previous copy of the logicalunit.

In a seventh aspect of the present invention a storage system includesat least one data storage unit and an intrusion detection and recoverysystem that detects an intrusion at a file system level, independent ofa host system.

In an eighth aspect of the present invention a computer system includes,at least one client machine, and at least one storage system, whereinthe storage system includes at least one data storage unit and anintrusion detection and recovery system for detecting an intrusion at afile system level, independent of a host system.

In a ninth aspect of the present invention a method (and system) fordetecting intrusions to stored data, includes creating a point-in-timecopy of a logical unit, where the point-in-time copy includes logicalunit information, and comparing at least one of the point-time-copy andthe logical unit information with a previous copy of the logical unit.

Unlike conventional intrusion detection methods discussed above, thepresent invention periodically copies storage logical units (LUNs) ofinterest (through fast and space efficient flash copy operations) andthen monitors the copies to detect if any unwanted modification has beenmade. Meanwhile, there is no interruption of service and the originalLUNs can be accessed without any limitations by the client machines orservers. The copying process is done such that there is always one“good” copy of the LUNs of interest. The frequency of making copies canbe set at any predetermined interval by the system administrators. Thehigher the frequency, the faster an intrusion can be detected and themore recent and up to date the recovered data is.

An advantage of the present invention is that it provides a method andsystem that makes periodic copies so that the user will always have arecent copy to fall back to when an intrusion is detected. Anotheradvantage of the present invention is that it performs periodic copiesin a large storage system.

Thus, the present invention provides a method (and system) for detectingintrusions to stored data that operates at a file system level,independently of a host system. This would provide a system with muchbetter protection and recovery from possible intrusions.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The foregoing and other exemplary purposes, aspects and advantages willbe better understood from the following detailed description of anexemplary embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, inwhich:

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of an example of the system 100 ofinterest for the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of thesystem 200 of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an intrusion detection andrecovery system 211 of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of themethod of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a second exemplary embodiment ofthe method of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a third exemplary embodiment ofthe method of the present invention;

FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of the environment and configurationof an exemplary computer system 700 for incorporating the presentinvention; and

FIG. 8 illustrates a storage medium 800 for storing steps of the programfor detecting intrusions to stored data.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIGS. 1-8, thereare shown exemplary embodiments of the method and structures accordingto the present invention.

The computer system of interest includes of one or more client systems,a storage system, and an intrusion detection system. The storage systemis made of a control unit and storage devices. The control unit performstasks such as management and virtualization of storage devices. It canalso implement various abstractions such as RAID. Storage devices arehard disks and other types of devices that can store data. The intrusiondetection system can be either integrated into the storage system and bea part of it or a separate system, connected to the storage system. Theintrusion detection system performs tasks such as monitoring accessesand detecting intrusions and responding to them. The intrusion detectionsystem also possibly has a console through which system administratorscan program it and receive various reports securely.

FIG. 1 depicts an environment 100 of an exemplary intrusion detectionsystem. Client machines 110 (CPUs, servers, etc.) are each connected toa storage system 101. The client machines 110 and the storage system 101form an enterprise storage system arranged as a storage area network(SAN). The storage system 101 includes at least one logical unit (LUN)103, where data is stored, and a storage controller 102. The storagecontroller 102 is a CPU that acts as the brain of the storage system 101and controls the functions of the storage system 101. The storage system101 depicted in. FIG. 1 includes two LUNs 103, but may include as manyLUNs as necessary to accommodate the stored data. Each LUN 103 mayrepresent any number of storage devices. The LUN may comprise any typeof storage device, including but not limited to magnetic hard discs,optical hard discs, and magnetic tapes.

An intrusion detection and recovery system (IDS) 111 is connected to thestorage system 101. As depicted in FIG. 1, the intrusion and detectionsystem 111 is external to the storage system 101. However, the IDS 111may be located internal to the storage system 101 as well. In otherwords, the IDS 111 can be run on a different machine connected to thestorage system 101 or may run on the same machine. Also, depending onthe number of LUNs 103 contained in the storage system 101, the storagesystem 101 could be connected to several IDSs

A management console 112 is coupled to each of the intrusion detectionand recovery systems 111. The management console 112 instructs the IDS,for example, as to which files in the LUNs 103 should not be modified orthat should not be decreased in size. The management console 112preferably is a secure console that is only accessible by systemmoderators or administrators and not by client users.

FIG. 2 depicts an intrusion detection and recovery system 211 accordingto an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. A clientmachine/server 210 is connected to a storage system 201. FIG. 2 depictsa single client machine/server 210. However, multiple clients can becoupled to the storage system 201. Copies 205 are made periodically 204,depending on the number of LUNs. The larger the number of LUNs, thelonger it takes to make point-in-time copies 205 and to run a comparisonof the copies, and thus the longer the amount of time between eachcopying function 204. However, more than one IDS 211 may be used toreduce the period of time between each copy.

In addition to making full copies 205 of each of the LUNs 203, the fullcopies 205 are converted into signatures 206, which may also be used forcomparison purposes. The signatures 206 contain complete or partialcopies of only specific files of interest as opposed to the full copies205, which include a copy of the entire volume of each LUN 203. Thus,comparing the signatures 206 is less time consuming and more efficient,because there is no need to compare the entire storage device, but onlythe specific files.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, thecopies 205 include time and space efficient point-in-time copies whichare continuously made by the copy operation 204 provided by the storagesystem 201. Copies are preferably only made of volumes of interest ineach of the LUNs 203. The volumes of interest are volumes that containfiles having access rules defined for them.

An intrusion detection and recovery system (IDS) 211 is connected to thestorage system 201. As depicted in FIG. 2, the intrusion and detectionsystem 211 is external to the storage system 201. However, as mentionedabove, the IDS 211 may be located internal to the storage system 201 aswell. In other words, the IDS 211 can be run on a different machineconnected to the storage system 201 or may run on the same machine.Also, depending on the number of LUNs 203 contained in the storagesystem 201, the storage system 201 could be connected to several IDSs211;

A management console 212 is coupled to each of the intrusion detectionand recovery systems 211. The management console 212 instructs the IDSfor example as to which files in the LUNs 203 should not be modified,should not be decreased in size, etc.

The management console 212, the IDS 211, the full copies 205 and thesignatures 206 are all maintained in a secure perimeter 213. The secureperimeter prevents outside access to the components inside. The clients210 do not have access to the secure perimeter 213. Access to the secureperimeter is limited to system administrators and other authorizedpeople. The secure perimeter 213 prevents intruders from accessing andaltering the copies 205 or the signatures 206.

The secure perimeter 213 is created by connecting the IDS and themanagement console 212 to the storage system 201 using fiber channels.There are several methods for creating a secure perimeter 213, one ofwhich includes using various zoning techniques in fiber channelnetworks. The present invention is not limited by this feature and thesecure perimeter 213 may be created by any conventionally known means,including a firewall or other similar forms of access prevention.

FIG. 3 depicts a block diagram of the intrusion detection system 211.The intrusion detection system 211 carries out several operationsincluding, but not limited to, making the copies 205 and the signatures206 of the LUNs and running a comparison of the copies 205 and thesignatures 206. The intrusion detection system 211 includes a monitoringunit 2111, a comparing unit 2112 and an alarm unit 2113. The monitoringunit 2111 monitors the storage system 201 for intrusions. The comparingunit 2112 copies the LUNs 203 and compares the copies 205 and thesignatures 206. The alarm unit 2113 notifies the moderator oradministrator of the system that an intrusion or unwanted modificationhas occurred.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating one exemplary embodiment of amethod 400 of the present invention.

According to this exemplary embodiment of the present invention, accessrules are defined (step 400 a) for one or more files in one or more ofthe LUNs 203 accessed by client systems 210. The access rules aredefined (step 400 a) for the IDS 211 through the secure console 212. Theaccess rules specify the types of actions that the client systems 210are allowed to perform and the types of actions that are to be treatedas a sign of an intrusion. For example, appending the content of a filecan be allowed while changing access permissions for a file can bespecified as a sign of intrusion. In other words, a client system 210may be given access to alter or append the data contained in the file,but will not be able to alter or append the metadata associated with thefile. The metadata includes information such as access permissions,location of the file, the date of when the file was created, etc.

The storage system 201 then makes a copy 205 of each of the LUNs 203 andmarks the copy 205 as a “good” copy (step 401). A “good” copy is definedas a copy having no intrusions or unwanted modifications. Copies are notmade in real time because the client systems 210 are constantly updatingthe data in the storage devices 203. The storage system 201 cannot checkthe actual LUNs 203 for intrusions and unwanted modifications at filesystem level because the LUNs 203 are constantly being updated by theclients. The copies 205 must be made instantaneously so that the copies205 can be made while a client system 210 is changing data in thestorage device 203.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, time andspace efficient point-in-time copies are made. The point-in-time copies205 are similar to “flash copies”. Because the point-in-time copies 205are made instantaneously, the present method avoids coherence problemsin the stored data. Furthermore, other techniques for synchronizationbetween client machines and a storage system can be used to guarantee afile system consistency for cases where the file system is not journalbased and cannot recover from power failure-like states.

Based on the access rules, a signature 206 for each file of interest iscreated (step 402) and stored in the storage system 201 where it can beaccessed only by the IDS and not the client systems. Signatures can besome form of encoding of data and metadata of a file or even a completecopy of the file and its metadata.

A new copy the LUN 203 is then made (step 403) and stored in the storagesystem 201. A signature 206 is then created (step 404) for the new copyof the LUN 203 and is also stored in the storage system 201.

Next the signatures for the files that are being monitored (thosedefined by the access rules) are compared (step 405). In other words,the signature 206 of the new copy is then compared with the signature206 of the previous copy 205. If the new signature is identical to theprevious signature, then no sign of intrusion is detected. If, however,the new signature is not identical to the previous signature, then anintrusion may have occurred.

Once an occurrence of an intrusion, or other unwanted modification, isdetected, the last “good” copy is saved to the storage system and thesystem administrator is informed of the intrusion (step 409). The last“good” copy is saved so that the most recent data, having no intrusions,can be recovered. The last “good” copy comprises the previous copy, orthe last copy 205 made having no intrusions.

If no intrusions are detected, then the new copy (or most recent copy)is marked as the “good” copy (step 406). The previous “good” copy isthen removed from the storage system (step 407). After a specifiedduration of time the process is started again (step 408) and another newcopy is made and compared to the most recent “good” copy.

As an example, the time duration between copies may be set at apredetermined duration (e.g., every 15 minutes). This means that a newcopy is made every 15 minutes, For example, a first copy of the LUN 203is made at 10:15 and no intrusions are found. This copy is now marked asa “good” copy and saved for comparison with the next new copy. A newcopy is made at 10:30 and the signatures of the new copy are compared tothe signatures of the previous “good” copy. During the comparison, nointrusions are found. Therefore, the copy made at 10:30 is now marked asthe “good” copy and the previous “good” copy (the copy made at 10:15) isremoved from the storage system 201. Another new copy is made at 10:45and the signatures are compared to the “good” copy made at 10:30. Anunwanted modification or intrusion is detected in the new copy made at10:45. The copy made at 10:45 is then removed from the storage system201, and the storage system 201 resorts back to the “good” copy made at10:30 and is used for data recovery. The method according to the presentinvention ensures that one “good” copy is always saved to revert back tofor data recovery.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a “good”copy of the LUN 203 of interest is always saved such that if and when anintrusion is detected, compromised data can be recovered. A copy 205 iscalled “good” when it passes the IDS 211 examination and no violation isdetected. Keeping such a copy 205 requires that the IDS 211 can createat least two copies 205 of a LUN 203. When a copy 205 is recognized as“good”, it is not deleted until the next periodic copy 205 is created,examined and recognized as “good”. When a new “good” copy is created,older “good” copies can be discarded and the process of creating newcopies 205 and examining them continues. A system administrator can setthe frequency of the copy and comparison operations. A smaller delaybetween the creation of each copy 205 leads to more frequent copies 205and examination of data. Intrusions are detected in less time from theoccurrence of the intrusions, which allows the system 201 to reduce theamount of data that is lost after an intrusion occurs.

Once a violation is detected, the “good” copy is protected, inside ofthe secure perimeter 213, for future reference and for recovery ofcompromised data. For example, the “good” copy can be used to recoverthe compromised file and to copy the file to the original LUN 203 oncethe source of the intrusion is detected and disabled. Alternatively, thestorage system 201 may block any further access to the LUNs 203 ofinterest until the problem is solved. Also, a versioning system may beused such that every copy of the data blocks is preserved until thesource of the intrusion is detected and disabled.

As discussed above, a space efficient point-in-time copy operation 204is used for copy operations. These copy operations do not require theactual copy of data blocks at the time of the creation of the copy. Thecopy operations are performed on one single LUN 203 or a group of LUNs203. When the copy 205 is created, an internal data structure is set upso that reads from data blocks of the LUN copy 205 are translated toreads from the original LUN 203. When a data block from the original LUN203 is written to, that block is first copied to another location suchthat future references to the corresponding block in the copy 205 areperformed correctly. When a block from the LUN copy 205 is written tofor the first time, the relationship between the copy 205 and originalLUN 203 for the specific block is broken. Since the point-in-time copyoperation 204 is space efficient (that is, data is not physicallycopied), the copy 205 is created almost instantaneously and withnegligible overhead and minimal storage traffic. This makes it possibleto perform the copy operation 204 periodically and on a large number ofLUNs 203. Also, the newly created copy 205 may be mounted on andexamined at file level.

Modern SAN storage systems, which support point-in-time copy operations,usually support the notion of consistency groups. A consistency group ismade of two or more LUNs 203 and operations such as a point-in-time copyon any of the LUNs 203 operate on all members of the group. Thisprovides the added benefit of support for file systems which includemore than one LUN 203 and also large database stores.

Second Embodiment

FIG. 5 illustrates a method 500 for storage-based intrusion detectionaccording to a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Inthe exemplary embodiment depicted in FIG. 5, the IDS 211 monitors andcompares the entire copy 205 of the LUN 203, instead of creating andcopying a signature 206 for each LUN 203.

Access rules are defined (step 500 a) for one or more files in one ormore of the LUNs 203 accessed by the client systems 210. The accessrules are defined (step 500 a) for the IDS 211 through the secureconsole 212.

The storage system 201 then makes a copy 205 of each of the LUNs 203 andmarks the copy 205 as a “good” copy (step 501). A new copy of the LUN203 is then made (step 502) and stored in the storage system 201. Thenew copy is then compared to the previous “good” copy (step 503) todetermine if an intrusion has occurred. If, for files which are beingmonitored, the new copy is identical to the previous “good” copy, thenno intrusion has occurred. If the new copy, however, is not identical tothe previous “good” copy then an intrusion has occurred.

Once an occurrence of an intrusion, or other unwanted modification, isdetected the last “good” copy is saved and the system administrator isinformed of the intrusion (step 507). The last “good” copy is saved sothat the most recent data having no intrusions can be recovered.

If no intrusions are detected, then the new copy (or most recent copy)is marked as the “good” copy (step 504), The previous “good” copy isthen removed from the storage system (step 505). After a specifiedduration of time, the process is started again (step 506) and anothernew copy is made and compared to the most recent “good” copy.

In another embodiment of the present invention, the storage system 201is enhanced to provide an interface through which the intrusiondetection and recovery system 211 can obtain a list of modified storageblocks. This can be achieved by providing a module (means) for creatingand initializing a bitmap corresponding to all or certain blocks of aLUN 203 where each bit is set when the corresponding block is modified.In such a system, before a new point-in-time copy 205 is created, a listof blocks is created and initialized. After the next point-in-time copy205 is created the list of modified blocks (blocks modified since theprevious copy) is obtained from the storage system. Such bitmaps can hecreated and kept with minimal impact on the performance of the storagesystem. The previous embodiments provide methods of intrusion detectionat the file level. In this exemplary embodiment, intrusion detection isconducted at the block level.

When a LUN 203 is being examined by the intrusion detection and recoverysystem, the corresponding bitmap is examined to see what files requireexamination. Thus, the intrusion detection system 211 can perform afile-to-storage-block translation. The intrusion detection and recoverysystem 211 can be running on one or more hosts with support for the filesystems of interest such that the file to block translation can beperformed more easily.

In this exemplary embodiment, files whose corresponding data blocks andmetadata blocks are not modified are not checked at all. Those withmodified blocks are checked either at file system level or at blocklevel. It should be noted that for a given file, storage blocks to bemonitored include not only the data blocks for the file and metadatablocks containing the file information, but also any other block whosemodification can lead to a violation of access rules for the file whichis being monitored. These include the blocks corresponding todirectories in the file path, etc.

In the previous embodiments, the IDS 211 preferably periodicallymonitors the files of interest on the newly created copy LUNs 205. Thus,the IDS 211 may read the data blocks corresponding to the files (andassociated metadata) in order to determine if any intrusions haveoccurred. Accesses to these blocks share the storage system bandwidthwith other systems and therefore reduce the bandwidth available to hostsystems. Considering the large number of files which are usuallymonitored, the number of LUNs 203 that the IDS 211 can monitor may belimited. The method according to the present exemplary embodimentminimizes the performance impact of the IDS 211 on the storage system201 and improves scalability of the IDS 211, considering that mostblocks of interest are not regularly modified.

FIG. 6 depicts a method 600 of intrusion detection according to thisexemplary embodiment of the present invention. Access rules are defined(step 600 a) for one or more files in one or more of the LUNs 203accessed by the client systems 210. The access rules are defined 600 forthe IDS 211 through the secure console 212.

The storage system 201 then makes a copy 205 of each of the LUNs 203 andmarks the copy 205 as a “good ” copy (step 601). The storage system 201then creates a list of blocks (bitmap) (step 602) of the LUN 203. A newcopy of the LUN 203 is then made (step 603) and stored in the storagesystem 201. The IDS 211 then obtains a list of modified blocks (step604) in the new copy of the LUN 203. The IDS 211 determines which blockshave been modified by referencing the list. The IDS then compares themodified blocks in the new copy to the corresponding blocks in theprevious “good” copy to determine if an intrusion has occurred (step605).

Once an occurrence of an intrusion, or other unwanted modification, isdetected the last “good” copy is saved and the system administrator isinformed of the intrusion (step 606). The last “good” copy is saved sothat the most recent data having no intrusions can be recovered.

If no intrusions are detected, then the new copy (or most recent copy)is marked as the “good” copy (step 607). The previous “good” copy isthen removed from the storage system (step 608). After a specifiedduration of time, the process is started again (step 609) and anothernew copy is made and compared to the most recent “good” copy.

FIG. 7 shows a typical hardware configuration of an informationhandling/computer system 700 in accordance with the invention thatpreferably has at least one processor or central processing unit (CPU)711. The CPUs 711 are interconnected via a system bus 712 to a randomaccess memory (RAM) 714, read-only memory (ROM) 716; input/output (I/O)adapter 718 (for connecting peripheral devices such as disk units 721and tape drives 740 to the bus 712), user interface adapter 722 (forconnecting a keyboard 724, mouse 726, speaker 728, microphone 732,and/or other user interface devices to the bus 712), communicationadapter 734 (for connecting an information handling system to a dataprocessing network, the Internet, an Intranet, a personal area network(PAN), etc.), and a display adapter 736 for connecting the bus to adisplay device 738 and/or printer 739 (e.g., a digital printer or thelike).

As shown in FIG. 7, in addition to the hardware and process environmentdescribed above, a different aspect of the invention includes a computerimplemented method for detecting intrusions to stored data. As anexample, this method may be implemented in the particular hardwareenvironment discussed above.

Such a method may be implemented, for example, by operating a computer,as embodied by a digital data processing apparatus to execute a sequenceof machine-readable instructions. These instructions may reside invarious types of signal-bearing media.

Thus, this aspect of the present invention is directed to a programmedproduct, comprising signal-bearing media tangibly embodying a program ofmachine-readable instructions executable by a digital data processorincorporating the CPU 711 and hardware above, to perform the method ofthe present invention.

This signal-bearing media may include, for example, a RAM (not shown)contained in the CPU 711, as represented by the fast-access storage, forexample. Alternatively, the instructions may be contained in anothersignal-bearing media, such as a magnetic tape storage diskette or CDdiskette 800 (FIG. 8), directly or indirectly accessible by the CPU 711.

Whether contained in the diskette 800, the computer/CPU 711, orelsewhere, the instructions may be stored on a variety ofmachine-readable data storage media, such as DASD storage (e.g., aconventional “hard drive” or a RAID array), magnetic tape, electronicread-only memory (e.g., ROM, EPROM or EEPROM), an optical storage device(e.g., CD-ROM, WORM, DVD, digital optical tape, etc.), or other suitablesignal-bearing media including transmission media such as digital andanalog and communication links and wireless. In an illustrativeembodiment of the invention, the machine-readable instructions maycomprise software object code, compiled from a language such as “C”,etc.

As discussed above in the exemplary embodiments, the intrusion detectionmethod and system provides computer system protection from manipulationof stored data. By enabling the IDS to operate at file system level andindependent of the host system, the present invention provides anintrusion detection and recovery method (and system) which improvesperformance and scalability for storage systems. Furthermore, unlikeconventional intrusion detection models, the present method and systemfor detecting intrusions may use point-in-time copies to improve thetime and space efficiency of the intrusion detection method.

It should be noted that the present invention covers detection andrecovery from any unwanted changes to the content of a storage systemwhether it has occurred because of an intrusion or not. Other possiblesources of unwanted changes include, but are not limited to, mistakesand erroneous commands made by users and system administrators,intentional changes by a disgruntled user, hardware malfunction, etc.

These exemplary techniques have been discussed exemplarily in thecontext of SANs, but can also be used for local machines (host-based) aswell, e.g., hard disks, local memories, and Network Attached Storage(NAS).

While the invention has been described in terms of several exemplaryembodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the inventioncan be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of theappended claims.

Further, it is noted that, Applicant's intent is to encompassequivalents of all claim elements, even if amended later duringprosecution.

What is claimed is:
 1. An intrusion detection and recovery system,comprising: a copying module that creates a point-in-time copy of astorage level logical unit, said point-in-time copy comprising a volumecopy of said storage level logical unit and a signature of said storagelevel logical unit; a comparison module that compares at least a portionof said point-in-time copy with a previous copy of the storage levellogical unit; and a judging module that, based on results of saidcomparison module, judges if a modification has occurred, wherein asignature of said point-in-time copy is compared with a signature ofsaid previous copy to detect a sign of an intrusion.
 2. The intrusiondetection and recovery system according to claim 1, further comprising:a removing module that, when the intrusion has been judged, removes saidpoint-in-time copy and saves said previous copy of the storage levellogical unit for data recovery.
 3. The intrusion detection and recoverysystem according to claim 2, further comprising: a marking module that,when the modification has not been judged, marks said point-in-time copyas a good copy and removes said previous copy of the storage levellogical unit.
 4. The intrusion detection and recovery system accordingto claim 3, further comprising: a preventing module that preventschanges on certain logical blocks of the stored data to take place whenthe changes violate predefined rules.
 5. The intrusion detection andrecovery system according to claim 1, further comprising: a definingmodule that defines access rules to identify which files of said storagelevel logical unit are monitored in said point-in-time copy.
 6. Astorage system, comprising: at least one data storage unit; an intrusiondetection and recovery system that detects an intrusion at a file systemlevel by creating a point-in-time copy of a storage level logical unit,said point-in-time copy comprising a volume copy of said storage levellogical unit and a signature of said storage level logical unit; a unitthat compares at least a portion of said point-in-time copy and saidstorage level logical unit information with a previous copy of saidstorage level logical unit; and a unit that judges, based on results ofsaid unit that compares, if a modification has occurred, wherein asignature of said point-in-time copy is compared with a signature ofsaid previous copy to detect a sign of an intrusion.
 7. The storagesystem according to claim 6, further comprising: a management consolethat controls an operation of said intrusion detection and recoverysystem.
 8. The storage system according to claim 7, wherein saidintrusion detection and recovery system, said management console, andsaid point-in-time copy of the storage level logical unit are maintainedin a secure perimeter, and wherein said secure perimeter is accessibleonly by a storage system administrator.
 9. The storage system accordingto claim 6, further comprising: a unit that, when the intrusion has beenjudged, removes said point-in-time copy and saves said previous copy ofthe storage level logical unit for data recovery.
 10. The storage systemaccording to claim 9, further comprising: a unit that, when themodification has not been judged, marks said point-in-time copy as agood copy and removes said previous copy of the storage level logicalunit.
 11. The storage system according to claim 10, further comprising:a unit that prevents changes on certain logical blocks of the storeddata to take place when the changes violate predefined rules.
 12. Thestorage system according to claim 6, further comprising: a unit thatdefines access rules to identify which files of said storage levellogical unit are monitored in said point-in-time copy.
 13. The storagesystem according to claim 6, wherein said previous copy of the storagelevel logical unit comprises an original copy of the storage levellogical unit.
 14. A computer system, comprising: at least one clientmachine; and a storage system, said at least one client machine beingconnected to said storage system, said storage system comprising: atleast one data storage unit; an intrusion detection and recovery systemthat detects an intrusion at a file system level by creating apoint-in-time copy of a storage level logical unit, said point-in-timecopy comprising a volume copy of said storage level logical unit and asignature of said storage level logical unit; a unit that compares atleast a portion of said point-in-time copy and said storage levellogical unit information with a previous copy of said storage levellogical unit; and a unit that judges, based on results of said unit thatcompares, if a modification has occurred, wherein a signature of saidpoint-in-time copy is compared with a signature of said previous copy todetect a sign of an intrusion.
 15. The computer system according toclaim 14, wherein said previous copy of the storage level logical unitcomprises an original copy of the storage level logical unit.
 16. Thecomputer system according to claim 14, wherein said intrusion detectionand recovery system, said management console, and said point-in-timecopy of the storage level logical unit are maintained in a secureperimeter, and wherein said secure perimeter is accessible only by astorage system administrator.
 17. The computer system according to claim14, wherein said storage system further comprises: a unit that, when theintrusion has been judged, removes said point-in-time copy and savessaid previous copy of the storage level logical unit for data recovery.18. The computer system according to claim 17, wherein said storagesystem further comprises: a unit that, when the modification has notbeen judged, marks said point-in-time copy as a good copy and removessaid previous copy of the storage level logical unit.
 19. The computersystem according to claim 18, wherein said storage system furthercomprises: a unit that prevents changes on certain logical blocks of thestored data to take place when the changes violate predefined rules. 20.The computer system according to claim 14, wherein said storage systemfurther comprises: a unit that defines access rules to identify whichfiles of said storage level logical unit are monitored in saidpoint-in-time copy.